Skip to main content

United We're a Monopoly

When I think of the unequal distribution of gains in our economy over the last 30 years I wonder what it would take to reverse the trend. It seems that the solution would have to include reducing the inequality in influence between upper management and employees.

In the past, one way to level the playing field was through unions. In theory this should give employees the power to negotiate with management as equals and claim a bigger share of the proceeds. But personally I've always been a little wary of unions. Part of it is their early association with communist and socialist philosophy and ties to organized crime. And it sometimes appears that the union is just another large corporation with their hand in the till at the members expense. It may be that negative stereotypes have made it easier for corporations slowly reduce the unions power. For whatever reason, union membership is at historically low levels.

Even if unions were more successful there seems to be a bigger problem. Sometimes powerful unions seem to cause undesirable outcomes, like teachers that can't be fired and autoworkers that price themselves out of a job. It seems to me that the underlying problem is that, unlike corporations, unions are allowed to become monopolistic. I believe that one monolithic teachers union can be just as damaging to education as Carlos Slim's lock on the Mexican telecommunications market, resulting in lower quality and higher prices.

I wonder if it would be possible to revitalize the benefits of unions by creating smaller competing entities that could combine the benefits of collective bargaining with the Darwinian forces of a competitive marketplace.

If so, the first step may be to use anti-trust legislation to break the industry wide unions into smaller entities that could compete for employees on their merits. (BTW, I have not idea how or if this would work.)

There could be other ways to reinvigorate or re-invent the idea of unions. One thought is via information sharing which seem to be revolutionizing lots of businesses. For instance, what if employees organized to share salary information, or feedback on management? I'm sure that there are other good ideas out there.

So, a few questions; 
  • Do you agree that inequality is an issue?
  • If so, how can it be reduced?
  • Can unions play a role?
  • Are monopolistic unions really a problem, or should they remain exempt from anti-trust regulations?
  • Do you have an idea for other ways to build employee influence?
Maybe there's a new billion dollar company to be started.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Money for Nothing?

Despite recent setbacks over the last 30 years the US economy has grown by over 120% in constant dollars. This should be good news for all Americans, but there's something interesting about this period of time that's quite different from prior years.

Over most of the history of the US gains in GDP were shared more or less equally on a percentage basis among all income groups. This makes sense if you assume that the success of an enterprise, whether it's a small business or the country as a whole, is the result of the efforts of the group rather than a few individuals.

What's unusual about the last 30 years is that, unlike prior periods, the gains have gone exclusively to the upper 20% of wage earners, and the bulk of that to the top 1%.

My first reaction is that this just doesn't seem 'fair'. Shouldn't everyone participate in our country's financial success?

We know from history that there's no economic force that tends to favor equitable distr…

Lets Cut Taxes!

The Texas legislature is in session and a tax cut is on the agenda with two competing proposals. One is to reduce property taxes and the other is to reduce sales taxes. Which one is the best?

I've been complaining about property taxes for years, and since I'm close to retirement I see property taxes as an unending, uncontrollable, and increasing drain on my future fixed income. Sales taxes on the other hand are proportional to my spending, and so somewhat controllable. That's why I'd prefer the property tax cut.

But on further reflection I changed my mind. Here's why...

If government is going to work it needs to be fair, but historians and economists know that this isn't the natural order of things. Throughout history wealth has tended to become concentrated. People in power naturally act in their own self interest, and the result is to further increase their power and wealth. I don't see this as intentionally evil. It's simply the result of rational (a…

Free market fixes for climate change?

In her recent article for the Chicago Tribune titled "End climate change scare tactics; try free market fixes" Rachel Marsden dismisses President Obama's recent concerns about climate change as a threat to global security and goes on to suggest that although there is no way to control the earth's climate we can adjust by allowing multinational corporations to conquer the environment. Both of these claims seem misguided to me for a number of reasons.

As to the concern about security and the environment there are many documented cases of destruction of the environment by human action and subsequent societal collapse. The story of Easter Island is a good example, and may serve as a miniature version of what could happen globally.

As the earth's climate changes, areas that were marginally able to support the local population will suffer. And unfortunately the results are not self contained. Collapse results in lawlessness, chaos, and refugees who naturally head for t…